Brief History:
The father of
Sikhism, Guru Nanak (1469-1539), was distinguished from almost all others who
founded states or empires in India by being a purely religious teacher. Deeply
Indian in the basic premises, which underlay even those aspects of his theology
which differed from the mainstream, he stressed the unity of God and the
universal brotherhood of man. He was totally opposed to the divisions of the
caste system and his teaching struggled to attain a practical balance between
Hinduism and Islam. His message was a message of reconciliation, first with God,
then with man. He exhibited no political ambition. Guru Nanak was succeeded by
nine other gurus of Sikhism. Together they laid the foundations of a religious
community in the Punjab, which would, much later, transform itself into the
Sikh Empire. Gradually this gentle religion of reconciliation became transformed
into a formidable, aggressive military power. It was a metamorphosis, which
was, at least partly, thrust upon the Sikh community by Mughal oppression. The
fifth guru of Sikhism, Arjun, was executed in 1606 on the order of Jahangir.
His successor, Hargobind, was to spend his years in constant struggle against
the Mughals, first against Jahangir and later against Shah Jahan. The ninth
guru, Tegh Bahadur, was executed by Aurangzeb for refusing to embrace Islam.
The stage had been set for a full confrontation with Mughal authority. It was
against such a background that Sikhism's tenth guru, Guru Govind Singh (1675- 1708),
set about organizing the Sikhs into a military power. He gave new discipline to
Sikhism. Its adherents were forbidden wine and tobacco and they were required
to conform to the 5 outward signs of allegiance - to keep their hair unshaven
and to wear short drawers (kuchcha),a comb (kungha), an iron bangle (kara) and
a dagger (kirpan). With Govind Singh's death the Khalsa, the Sikh brotherhood, emerged
as the controlling body of Sikhism and the Granth, the official compilation of
Govind Singh's teaching, became the “Bible” of Sikhism. At this point the Sikhs
took to the hills. It was here, constantly harassed by Mughal forces, that Sikh
militarism was forged into an effective weapon and tempered by fire. Gradually the
Sikhs emerged from their safe forts in the hills and made their presence felt
in the plains of the Punjab. As Nadir Shah retired from Delhi laden with the
prizes of war in 1739, the stragglers of his Persian army were cut down by the
Sikhs. Similarly, Ahmad Shah Durrani's first intrusion into India (1747-1748) was
made the more lively by Sikh sorties into his rear guard. Gradually the Sikhs
became both more confident and more effective, and their quite frequent
military reversals served only to strengthen their determination and to deepen
their sense of identity. Their first notable success came about 1756 when the
Sikhs temporarily occupied Lahore and used the Mughal mint to strike their own
rupee bearing the inscription: Coined
by the grace of the Khalsa in the country of Ahmad,conquered by Jessa the
Kalal. But
the Sikhs were, as yet, most effective as guerrilla bands operating out of the
hill country. On Ahmad Shah's fifth expedition into India (1759-1761) the Sikhs
reverted to their well-tried role of forming tight mobile units, which could
choose both the time and the place of
their attacks on the Durrani army. In spite of a serious reverse near Bernala
in 1762 at the hands of Ahmad Shah, the Sikhs once again regrouped. In December
1763 they decisively defeated the Durrani governor of Sirhind and occupied the
area. The Sikhs now swept all before them, recapturing Lahore in 1765. The
whole tract of land between the Jhelum and the Sutlej was now divided among the
Sikh chieftains. At Lahore, and later at Amritsar, the Govind Shahi rupee
proclaiming that Guru Govind Singh had received Deg, Tegh and Fath (Grace, Power and
Victory) from Nanak was struck. The name of the Mughal emperor was pointedly
omitted. The Sikhs now subdivided into twelve misls
“equals”,
each responsible for its own fate and each conducting its own military
adventures into surrounding areas. By 1792 the most prominent chief in the
Punjab was Mahan Singh of the Sukerchakia misl. His death that
same year left the boy destined to become Sikhism's best-known statesman,
Ranjit Singh, as his successor. A year later Shah Zaman, King of Kabul,
confirmed him as the possessor of Lahore. For the next forty years Ranjit Singh
dominated Sikh affairs. In 1802 he seized Amritsar and followed this by
capturing Ludhiana (1806), Multan (1818), Kashmir (1819), Ladakh (1833) and
Peshawar (1834). By the time of his death in June 1839 Ranjit was the only
leader in India capable of offering a serious challenge to the East India
Company. By a treaty concluded in 1809 with the British, Ranjit had been confirmed
as ruler of the tracts he had occupied south of the Sutlej, but the agreement
had restricted him from seeking any further expansion to the north or west of
the river. In spite of the terms of the treaty, the British remained suspicious
of Ranjit's ultimate intentions. His steady policy of expansion frequently left
apprehensions in the minds of the British - with whose interests Ranjit's own
often clashed - that the Sikhs had secret ambitions against Company controlled
territory. But it was to Ranjit's credit that he welded the Sikhs of the Punjab
into an effective and unified fighting force, capable of resisting both the
Afghans and the Marathas and able to stand up to British pressures. He
inherited a loose alliance of fiercely independent chiefs, he left a
disciplined and well equipped army of over fifty thousand men. He also left a
well consolidated regional empire in the extreme northwest of India, roughly
extending over the northern half of present-day Pakistan. After the death of
Ranjit the Sikh empire began to disintegrate as power passed from chief to
chief in murderous rivalry. At the same time relationships with the British
began to deteriorate. The treaty of 1809 no longer proved able to hold the
peace, and the Sikh army attacked the British (1845-1846) only to be badly
beaten in a series of confrontations. The Treaty of Lahore, which followed this
first Anglo-Sikh war reduced the Sikh army to a maximum of twenty thousand men
and twelve thousand cavalry. It obliged the Sikhs to cede the Jallandar Doab
and Kashmir to the British, and required them to pay an indemnity of fifty
thousand pounds and accept a British resident at their court. In 1848 the Sikhs
again revolted, and were again crushed. In 1849 the Punjab was annexed and from
that time onward they came under British rule.
RULERS
Ranjit Singh,
VS1856-1896/1799-1839AD
Kharak Singh,
VS1896-1897/1839-1840AD
Sher Singh,
VS1897-1900/1840-1843AD
Dulip Singh,
VS1900-1906/1843-1849AD
KM# 22.1
Mint: Amritsar
RUPEE
Silver Obv: Partial actual dates Rev: VS1885 fixed
No comments:
Post a Comment